Okay, so I’ll start this review by stating for the record that I’m not the world’s biggest vampire fan. In fact, I’m not a fan at all. I go out of my way to avoid the vast majority of vampire novels. So, yes, it was unfortunate that the synopsis of Blood River isn’t a little clearer that vampires are the beasties involved. Maybe the ‘perfect, sensual woman’ and ‘creature of pure evil with a taste for human blood’ should have clued me in. Either way, I decided to soldier on regardless. But I think it’s only fair to point out that a vampire lover might enjoy this a lot more than I did.
Oh, one other thing I should mention. One thing I dislike more than vampires? Awkward sex scenes.
Blood River plays on the tried and tested horror cliché of naïve youngsters picking up a mysterious (and extremely ominous looking) hitchhiker. One thing I did like is that Greske turned this cliché on its head by having the hitchhiker be a sexy girl, rather than a creepy old man. Nicely done.
I did like the characterisation in Blood River, especially where Godfrey was concerned (he was great!) and the boys did work well as a group of friends. They were believable and I did grow to like them, though not enough to feel particularly invested in their futures.
So the characterisation and the hitchhiking were the positives. Unfortunately, that’s about as much praise as I can possibly drag out for Blood River. It just didn’t work for me. The main reason why? Sensual bloodletting. Two words that are never going to do anything for me.
However, if sensual bloodletting (even the phrase is so cringe worthy it makes me want to curl up in the foetal position and weep) is your thing then I’m pretty sure you will go insane for Blood River. Trust me, there is enough sensual bloodletting (foetal position) to keep you more than satisfied.
Unfortunately this isn’t one that I can recommend. As I said, maybe hardcore vampire fans will enjoy it but the writing and the story just weren’t strong enough to change my mind about the genre. However, if you think this may be the book for you then do check out this
(http://tjbook-list.blogspot.com/2009/12/guest-review-blood-river-by-david.html) great review over at Alternative-Read.com.
Oh, one other thing I should mention. One thing I dislike more than vampires? Awkward sex scenes.
Blood River plays on the tried and tested horror cliché of naïve youngsters picking up a mysterious (and extremely ominous looking) hitchhiker. One thing I did like is that Greske turned this cliché on its head by having the hitchhiker be a sexy girl, rather than a creepy old man. Nicely done.
I did like the characterisation in Blood River, especially where Godfrey was concerned (he was great!) and the boys did work well as a group of friends. They were believable and I did grow to like them, though not enough to feel particularly invested in their futures.
So the characterisation and the hitchhiking were the positives. Unfortunately, that’s about as much praise as I can possibly drag out for Blood River. It just didn’t work for me. The main reason why? Sensual bloodletting. Two words that are never going to do anything for me.
However, if sensual bloodletting (even the phrase is so cringe worthy it makes me want to curl up in the foetal position and weep) is your thing then I’m pretty sure you will go insane for Blood River. Trust me, there is enough sensual bloodletting (foetal position) to keep you more than satisfied.
Unfortunately this isn’t one that I can recommend. As I said, maybe hardcore vampire fans will enjoy it but the writing and the story just weren’t strong enough to change my mind about the genre. However, if you think this may be the book for you then do check out this
(http://tjbook-list.blogspot.com/2009/12/guest-review-blood-river-by-david.html) great review over at Alternative-Read.com.


